InfyCalculator
🔨

Turned Surface Finish (Ra) Calculator

Theoretical and practical surface roughness of a turned or faced part from feed per revolution and insert nose radius (mm or inch): Ra, Rz, exact Rt and RMS in µm and µin, the ISO N grade, the feed or nose radius needed for a target Ra or Rz, wiper-insert estimates, rpm and cutting time, and a feed-versus-finish table and chart.

Solve for
Feed per revolution
Insert nose radius
Nose radius
Target Ra (for the required feed)
Target is
Practical correction
Custom correction factor
Workpiece diameter (for rpm and time)
Cutting speed
Length of cut
Loading calculator…

How it works

Theoretical Rmax (Rz) = f² ÷ (8 r); Ra ≈ f² ÷ (18√3 r) = f² ÷ (31.2 r) (f in mm/rev, r in mm, result in mm → ×1,000 for µm); exact cusp Rt = r − √(r² − f²/4); practical Ra ≈ 1.3–1.8 × theoretical; feed for target Ra: f = √(Ra ÷ factor × 31.2 r); nose radius for target: r = f² ÷ (31.2 × Ra ÷ factor); rpm = Vc × 1,000 ÷ (π D)

A turned surface is a helical groove left by the insert nose. Its theoretical peak-to-valley height is set purely by geometry: the feed squared over eight times the nose radius. For the arc-shaped cusp, Ra works out to the feed squared over 18√3 (about 31.2) times the radius, roughly a quarter of the peak-to-valley height; some shop charts round the divisor to 32, which reads about 2.5% lower. So halving the feed quarters the roughness, and doubling the nose radius halves it. That is why finishing passes use small feeds and large-radius or wiper inserts, whose flat land smears the peaks. Real surfaces are rougher than the formula by 30–80% because of built-up edge, tool wear, vibration and material tearing, so the calculator applies a condition factor that you can replace with your own measured ratio. You can work in either direction: enter a feed to see the finish, or enter the Ra or Rz on the drawing to get the largest feed or the smallest nose radius that will hold it. The drawing default of Ra 3.2 µm is easy at 0.25 mm/rev with a 0.8 mm nose; Ra 0.8 needs about 0.12 mm/rev and a good setup; below 0.4 is grinding territory.

Worked example

Feeding 0.2 mm/rev with a 0.8 mm nose radius: theoretical Ra = 0.2² ÷ (31.18 × 0.8) × 1,000 = 1.60 µm (Rz 6.25 µm), or about Ra 2.08 µm (82 µin, grade N8) in normal production. To hold Ra 1.6 µm reliably the feed should drop to about 0.175 mm/rev, or the nose radius should grow to about 1.04 mm (a 1.2 mm insert) at the same feed. A wiper insert could stay near 0.35 mm/rev. On a 50 mm bar at 200 m/min that is 1,273 rpm and 255 mm/min, so a 50 mm long finishing pass takes about 12 seconds.

Sources: Sandvik Coromant — turning formulas and definitions (surface roughness, rpm, cutting time) · Tribonet — turning surface finish from feed and nose radius (exact and approximate cusp models)

Frequently asked questions

Does cutting speed affect finish?

Indirectly — too low a speed in steel promotes built-up edge and tearing (worse finish); higher speeds with sharp coated inserts approach the theoretical value. Speed does not appear in the geometric formula, but the calculator uses it for rpm and cutting time.

Ra vs Rz vs RMS?

Ra is the arithmetic average deviation; Rz the average peak-to-valley over sampling lengths (≈ 4–7× Ra for turned surfaces); RMS ≈ 1.11 × Ra. Older US drawings quote RMS or µin (Ra µm × 39.37). If your drawing gives Rz, switch the target to Rz under More options.

What feed do I need for Ra 1.6 or Ra 0.8?

With a 0.8 mm nose in normal production, about 0.175 mm/rev for Ra 1.6 µm and 0.12 mm/rev for Ra 0.8 µm. Choose “Feed for a target” to get the figure for your radius and conditions.

Why 31.2 and not 32?

The exact Ra of an arc-shaped cusp is f² ÷ (18√3 r), and 18√3 is 31.18. Many charts use f² ÷ 32r because it equals a quarter of the peak-to-valley height. The difference is about 2.5%, far smaller than real-world scatter.

Should I use a bigger nose radius or a slower feed?

A bigger radius keeps productivity but raises cutting forces and the risk of chatter on slender parts. A slower feed costs cycle time, and very small feeds can rub rather than cut. Wiper inserts are often the best compromise on rigid setups.

Related calculators

Shop reference values; adjust for tool maker recommendations, machine rigidity, coolant and the actual material condition, and verify fits and tolerances against the applicable standard (ISO 286 / ASME B4.1, ISO 965 / ASME B1.1).