On-Prem vs Cloud TCO Calculator
Compare the total cost of ownership of on-premises hardware against a cloud subscription over several years, and see which is cheaper.
How it works
on-prem TCO = hardware + annual running cost × years · cloud TCO = monthly cost × 12 × years
On-premises spending is front-loaded: a large capital outlay for hardware, then a flatter annual cost for power, space and administration. Cloud spending is the mirror image — no upfront hardware, but a recurring bill that accumulates every month. Because of that shape, cloud often wins over a short horizon or for spiky, uncertain workloads, while owned hardware can pull ahead once it is fully utilised over several years. This simple model ignores the finer points — the time value of money, hardware refresh cycles, cloud discounts and the value of elasticity — so treat it as a first-pass comparison, not a budget.
Worked example
With $60,000 of hardware, $18,000/year to run it, and a $3,200/month cloud alternative over 3 years: on-prem = 60,000 + 18,000 × 3 = $114,000; cloud = 3,200 × 12 × 3 = $115,200. On-prem is cheaper by $1,200 — essentially a tie at this horizon.
Frequently asked questions
Does this account for the time value of money?
No. It sums nominal cash costs so the comparison stays simple. For a rigorous analysis, discount future cloud and running costs to present value, since a dollar spent in year three is worth less than one spent today.
What running costs should I include on-prem?
Everything beyond the hardware: electricity and cooling, data-centre space or facilities, network, software licences, hardware support contracts, and the staff time to administer it. These often rival the hardware cost over a few years.
Why does cloud sometimes look more expensive here yet still win?
This model ignores elasticity, avoided capital risk, and the ability to scale down. Cloud’s value often lies in flexibility and speed rather than the raw multi-year total, especially for variable or growing workloads.
Related calculators
A simplified cash-cost comparison for planning, not a substitute for a full financial model.