InfyCalculator
🎯

Telescope Focal Ratio & Image Scale Calculator

Focal ratio, image scale in arc-seconds per pixel, sampling versus seeing (with 1×1 to 4×4 binning), camera field of view, relative exposure time and the effect of a Barlow or reducer — plus Dawes and Rayleigh limits, Airy disk size, the ideal planetary focal ratio, limiting magnitude, light grasp and eyepiece magnification, with presets for popular astro cameras.

Aperture
Focal length
Barlow / reducer factor
Camera / sensor
Camera pixel size
Sensor width
Sensor height
Binning
Typical seeing (star FWHM)
Eyepiece focal length (visual)
Eyepiece apparent field
Loading calculator…

How it works

Focal ratio = focal length × Barlow/reducer ÷ aperture; image scale (″/px) = 206.265 × pixel size (µm) × binning ÷ focal length (mm); sampling = seeing FWHM ÷ image scale (aim for 2–3.5); FOV (°) = sensor size ÷ focal length × 57.3; exposure ∝ f-ratio²; Dawes limit = 116 ÷ aperture (mm) arc-seconds, Rayleigh = 138 ÷ aperture; Airy disk = 2.44 × λ × f-ratio; planetary f-ratio ≈ 3.6–5 × pixel size (µm); limiting magnitude ≈ 7.7 + 5 log₁₀(aperture in cm); magnification = focal length ÷ eyepiece

The focal ratio is focal length over aperture and it governs two different things. For extended objects — nebulae, galaxies, the sky background — the exposure needed for a given surface brightness scales with the square of the f-ratio, so f/4 gathers light on the sensor four times faster than f/8, which is why imagers prize fast scopes and reducers. For resolution what matters is image scale: how many arc-seconds each pixel covers, set by pixel size, binning and focal length. Stars blurred by the atmosphere to 2–3 arc-seconds should span about two to three and a half pixels — under-sampling loses detail, over-sampling spreads the light thin and forces longer exposures. Match the scale to your typical seeing, not to the diffraction limit, which in most backyards is far finer than the air allows; then the sensor size sets the field of view. Pick a camera preset or type your own pixel and sensor size, try 2×2 binning, and compare every common Barlow and reducer in the table. Planetary imaging is the exception: with very short exposures that freeze the seeing, the target is the diffraction limit, which for green light means a focal ratio of about 3.6 to 5 times the pixel size in microns. The page also gives the Dawes and Rayleigh limits, the Airy disk size, an approximate visual limiting magnitude and light grasp, and what a chosen eyepiece shows.

Worked example

A 200 mm f/5 Newtonian (1,000 mm) with 3.76 µm pixels: image scale 0.78″/px, so 2.5″ seeing spans 3.2 pixels — well sampled. An APS-C sensor (23.5 × 15.7 mm) covers 1.35° × 0.90°, and exposures run at the f/5 baseline; a 0.75× reducer would make it f/3.75 with 1.03″/px and 56% of the exposure time. Binned 2×2, the same camera gives 1.55″/px (1.6 px per star — under-sampled). For Jupiter with a 2.9 µm planetary camera, aim for about f/10.5–f/14.5, a 2×–3× Barlow on this scope. A 25 mm eyepiece gives 40× with a 1.3° true field and a 5 mm exit pupil.

Sources: Astronomy Tools — CCD suitability and image scale · Astronomy Tools — Dawes, Rayleigh and limiting magnitude

Frequently asked questions

Does a faster f-ratio make point sources (stars) brighter?

For stars it is aperture that counts — the same aperture collects the same photons per star regardless of f-ratio; f-ratio only changes how concentrated they are on the sensor and how bright the background is.

What about 2×2 binning?

Binning doubles the effective pixel size, doubling the image scale in ″/px — the way to fix over-sampling without changing optics, at the cost of resolution you were not using anyway. Choose 2×2 to 4×4 above, and the binning table compares all four.

What image scale should I aim for?

For deep-sky imaging, about a third to a half of your typical seeing: 0.7–1.25″ per pixel for 2.5″ seeing. Below that you are over-sampled, above it under-sampled. The “Ideal pixel size” result turns that into a pixel size for your focal length.

What focal ratio do I need for planetary imaging?

Roughly 3.6 to 5 times your pixel size in microns: f/10–15 for 2.9 µm pixels, f/7–10 for 2.0 µm. The result shows which Barlow gets you there from your telescope’s native focal ratio.

How do I find my telescope’s focal length?

It is printed on the tube or in the specifications, often as “D = 200 mm, F = 1000 mm” or as a focal ratio: focal length = focal ratio × aperture, so a 150 mm f/8 has 1,200 mm.

Related calculators

Observing estimate. Seeing, light pollution, optical quality and your own eyes move the practical limits by a magnitude or more.