Bonferroni Correction Calculator
Adjust your significance level for multiple comparisons — Bonferroni and Šidák thresholds, plus the family-wise error rate you would face without correcting.
How it works
α_per-test = α ÷ m · Šidák: 1 − (1−α)^(1/m) · FWER = 1 − (1−α)^m
Each extra hypothesis test is another chance for a false positive. Bonferroni divides the error budget evenly across tests, which controls the family-wise error rate but is conservative. Šidák is slightly less strict when tests are independent; Holm’s step-down method is uniformly more powerful and still simple.
Worked example
α = 0.05, m = 12: Bonferroni threshold 0.00417; the uncorrected chance of a spurious hit is 46%.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bonferroni too conservative?
Often, for many correlated tests. Consider Holm (sequential Bonferroni) or false-discovery-rate control (Benjamini–Hochberg) in exploratory work.
Do I divide α or multiply p?
Equivalent: compare p to α/m, or compare p × m to α.
Related calculators
For education — check assumptions (sample size, distribution) before using statistics in real decisions.