InfyCalculator
🔬

Exoplanet Transit Depth & Duration Calculator

Calculate how much a transiting exoplanet dims its star — transit depth from the planet-to-star radius ratio in percent and parts per million — plus the transit duration from period and orbital distance, the planet radius implied by a measured depth, and detectability against photometric noise.

Solve for
Planet radius
Measured depth (for radius mode)
Star radius
Orbital period
Star mass (for the orbit size)
Photometric noise per transit
Loading calculator…

How it works

depth = (R_p ÷ R★)² · R_p = R★ × √depth · a = ∛(G M★ P² ÷ 4π²) · T₁₄ ≈ (P ÷ π) × (R★ + R_p) ÷ a · P(transit) ≈ R★ ÷ a

When a planet crosses the face of its star it blocks a fraction of the light equal to the ratio of the two disc areas, so the dip in brightness is simply the square of the radius ratio — a Jupiter across a Sun removes about 1%, an Earth about 0.008%. That is why the method finds small planets most easily around small stars and why the star's radius must be known to turn a depth into a planet size. The duration follows from geometry and Kepler's law: the planet's orbital speed and the chord it cuts across the stellar disc give the time from first to last contact. Repeating transits at a fixed period both confirm the signal and, through stacking, let missions dig well below the single-event noise.

Worked example

A Jupiter-size planet (11.2 R⊕) crossing a Sun-size star: (11.2 × 6,371 ÷ 695,700)² = 0.0105, a 1.05% or 10,500 ppm dip. On a 3.5-day orbit around a solar-mass star (a = 0.045 AU) the transit lasts about 3.0 hours, and with 200 ppm noise it is detected at S/N ≈ 53 in a single event. An Earth on the same orbit would dip only 84 ppm.

Frequently asked questions

Why is the measured radius uncertain if the depth is precise?

Because R_p = R★ × √depth: a 10% error in the stellar radius becomes a 10% error in the planet radius. Gaia parallaxes and asteroseismology have tightened stellar radii to a few percent for many hosts.

Does limb darkening change the depth?

Yes — the star is brighter at the centre, so a central transit is slightly deeper than the simple area ratio and the light curve is rounded rather than flat-bottomed. Fitting codes include it; this estimate does not.

Related calculators

Textbook astrophysics with simplifying assumptions (circular orbits, point masses, low-redshift Hubble law, blackbody equilibrium). Real systems deviate; use published catalogue values and full models for research.