InfyCalculator
❤️

Rockall Score Calculator (Upper GI Bleeding)

Rockall score for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding — age, shock, comorbidity, endoscopic diagnosis and stigmata of recent haemorrhage — pre-endoscopy and complete score with mortality.

Score type
Age
Shock
Comorbidity
Endoscopic diagnosis (complete score only)
Major stigmata of recent haemorrhage (complete score only)
Loading calculator…

How it works

Pre-endoscopy Rockall = age (0–2) + shock (0–2) + comorbidity (0/2/3); range 0–7. Complete Rockall = pre-endoscopy score + diagnosis (0–2) + stigmata of recent haemorrhage (0/2); range 0–11. Complete score ≤ 2 low risk · ≥ 8 high risk.

The Rockall score (Rockall, Logan, Devlin and Northfield, 1996) was developed from a UK national audit of more than 4,000 patients to predict death after acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The clinical (pre-endoscopy) part uses age, shock and comorbidity; endoscopy adds the diagnosis and the stigmata of recent haemorrhage. A complete score of 2 or less identifies patients at low risk of rebleeding and death who may be suitable for early discharge, while scores of 8 or more carried about 41% mortality in the original cohort. Guidelines now prefer the Glasgow-Blatchford score before endoscopy to identify patients who can be managed as outpatients.

Worked example

A 70-year-old (1) with pulse 108 and systolic pressure 118 mmHg (1) and ischaemic heart disease (2), whose endoscopy shows a peptic ulcer (1) with only a clean base (0): complete Rockall = 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 0 = 5 / 11 — intermediate risk, with 10.8% mortality in the original study.

Sources: Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996

Frequently asked questions

What is a high Rockall score?

A complete score of 8 or more is high risk (about 41% mortality in the 1996 cohort). Scores of 2 or less are low risk.

What is the difference between pre-endoscopy and complete Rockall?

The pre-endoscopy (clinical) score uses only age, shock and comorbidity (0–7). The complete score adds the endoscopic diagnosis and stigmata of recent haemorrhage (0–11) and is the version validated for mortality.

Rockall or Glasgow-Blatchford?

Glasgow-Blatchford is better before endoscopy for spotting patients who need no intervention; the complete Rockall score is used after endoscopy to estimate mortality and rebleeding.

Related calculators

Clinical decision tool for education and for use by trained clinicians alongside clinical judgement — not a diagnosis and not a substitute for medical assessment. Scores validated in specific populations may not apply to every patient.