Value at Risk (VaR) & Expected Shortfall Calculator (Parametric)
Estimate how much a position or portfolio could lose over a horizon at 95% or 99% confidence using volatility: parametric (normal) value at risk in currency and percent, conditional VaR / expected shortfall for the tail beyond it, scaling from daily to multi-day horizons, the effect of expected return, a fat-tail (Student-t) comparison, and a table across confidence levels.
How it works
σ_h = σ_daily × √h (σ_daily = σ_annual ÷ √252) · VaR = V × (z_c × σ_h − μ_h), z₉₅ = 1.645, z₉₉ = 2.326 · ES (CVaR) = V × σ_h × φ(z_c) ÷ (1 − c) − V μ_h · Student-t VaR = V × t_c(ν) × σ_h × √((ν − 2) ÷ ν)
Value at risk compresses a return distribution into one number: the loss that will be exceeded only a chosen small fraction of the time over a stated horizon. In its parametric form it takes the position's volatility, scales it to the horizon by the square root of time, and multiplies by the normal quantile for the confidence level; expected shortfall goes one step further and averages the losses beyond that threshold, which is why regulators moved to it — VaR says where the tail starts, not how long it is. Because real returns have fatter tails than the bell curve, a Student-t version or historical simulation is the honest companion at 99% and above.
Worked example
A $250,000 equity portfolio with 18% annual volatility has a daily σ of 1.13% and a 10-day σ of 3.59%; at 99% confidence the parametric VaR is about $20,900 (8.3%) and the expected shortfall about $23,900 (9.6%) — the average loss in the worst 1% of two-week periods. A Student-t with 4 degrees of freedom puts the 99% VaR near $23,700, about 14% higher, and such a loss should be exceeded roughly 2.5 ten-day windows a year.
Frequently asked questions
Parametric, historical or Monte Carlo VaR?
Parametric is instant and transparent but assumes normality; historical VaR takes the actual worst percentile of past returns (captures fat tails, limited by the sample); Monte Carlo simulates from a chosen model. Banks run all three; for a quick sanity check on a position, parametric plus a t adjustment is fine.
Why 252 days?
The number of US trading days in a year; annual volatility ÷ √252 gives daily. Some markets use 250 or 260 — the difference is under 2%.
Related calculators
Educational finance mathematics. Models such as Black-Scholes, parametric VaR and lognormal Monte Carlo rest on simplifying assumptions (constant volatility, normal returns, no fat tails) that real markets violate. Nothing here is investment advice — consult a licensed professional for decisions about your money.